Interactive working illustration

What is an unresolved decision consuming?

The cost isn't always on a line item. Leadership time, repeated coordination, and delayed value can accumulate while a decision works its way through the business. Explore two scenarios using your own assumptions.

Not an ROI calculator. This model helps frame a business question. It does not diagnose the cause of delay, estimate an advisor's impact, or promise savings.

Runs only in your browser

For a CEO or owner: How much management capacity is tied up while the business waits for a decision, and what expected result might start later as a consequence?

Build the scenario

The numbers are illustrative examples, not RebelEdge client data. Replace them with your assumptions; set unknown estimates to zero.

Decision timing

Current expected unresolved period Weeks before a usable decision

Alternative period Weeks under a faster, feasible scenario

Management and coordination time

Leaders pulled into the loop Unique people; do not double-count support staff

Hours per leader per week Only incremental time linked to the unresolved decision

Loaded hourly cost per leader ($) Compensation + overhead proxy, not a cash cost avoided

Other coordination hours per week Incremental work by other people; excludes leader hours above

Loaded hourly coordination cost ($) Only for people not counted above

Optional value-timing illustration

Annual incremental contribution after action ($) Enter 0 if not estimated or not causally linked

This last field is a hypothetical annual run rate once the outcome begins, not the company's revenue or an automatic financial loss. The model assumes the run rate is proportional over time only to illustrate potential timing exposure.

What the scenarios suggest

Live estimates based only on the assumptions at left.

Illustrative scenario

Weekly capacity tied to the decision

Fully loaded time allocation

Current-period capacity exposure

Under the current timeline

Capacity exposure difference

Not assured cash savings

Possible contribution timing shift

Separate scenario; do not add to capacity

Time consumed: current versus alternative

Illustrative scenario

Current unresolved period16 weeks

Alternative unresolved period8 weeks

8 weeks of difference between the scenarios.

The leadership question

What is holding the decision open, where is it drawing leadership time, and which action could improve the outcome without removing evidence or control the business needs?

Interpretation: Capacity exposure measures time allocated to this issue at assumed fully loaded rates; it is not a cash-saving forecast. Potential contribution timing is an independent scenario, not proven lost EBITDA, revenue, or valuation. They may overlap and must not be summed.

If a decision like this is open in your business, you can request a private conversation.

Assumptions and limitations

Every figure above comes from the four lines below, in plain words, so nothing is hidden. The same arithmetic is used for both lenses; only the reading of the result changes.

Weekly capacity tied to the decision = leaders × hours per leader per week × loaded hourly cost per leader, plus other coordination hours per week × loaded hourly coordination cost.
Current-period capacity exposure = weekly capacity × current unresolved weeks.
Capacity exposure difference = weekly capacity × (current weeks minus alternative weeks). If the alternative is not shorter, the difference is zero.
Possible contribution timing shift = annual incremental contribution ÷ 52 × (current weeks minus alternative weeks). Again zero if the alternative is not shorter.

Negative or blank entries count as zero. Capacity cost and contribution timing are kept separate and are never added together; they describe two different kinds of exposure that may overlap. The model assumes the contribution run rate is spread evenly across the year. Values are rounded to whole dollars for display, so a weekly figure such as $4,012.50 shows as $4,013.

Nothing you type is stored or sent anywhere. The page uses no cookies, analytics, external scripts or fonts. Reloading the page returns the illustrative examples.

What this model deliberately does not calculate.

It does not assume delay is unnecessary, assign a cause, establish that a different decision would be better, predict the probability of an opportunity, price an engagement, estimate an advisor's impact, translate temporary timing into permanent EBITDA improvement, or apply an exit multiple. Some decisions warrant additional evidence or should not proceed.

For PE sponsors, clarify whether the estimated annual contribution is EBITDA, cash flow, or another measure before presenting it in a value-creation plan. No dollar value here should be called verified without underlying client records.

Jennifer Bryk · Board & CEO Advisor · Founder, RebelEdge Advisory

Leading Through the RebelEdge